MUMBAI: Twenty years after a polio-stricken Solapur resident accused her husband of failing to consummate the marriage and insisting that she first sleep with his friends, the Bombay high court has ruled that he is guilty under the anti-dowry law for mental harassment.
Justice Sadhna Jadhav convicted Bhaskar Mane for committing the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which is usually applied in dowry harassment cases. But the judge accepted the plea by Mane's lawyer to treat his case with some leniency as over two decades have passed. The high court sentenced him to two months in jail, which he had already undergone in 1994 after his arrest.
"(The wife) deposed before the court in her substantive evidence that her husband had refused to consummate the marriage and was insisting upon her to have sexual relations with three other persons. The allegation itself would be mental harassment to the wife," said the judge. "(It) can be safely inferred that the accused has committed offence punishable under section 498."
Mane married Laxmibai in 1993, but lived with him only for a short time as they often quarrelled. A year later, she approached the local police and alleged that her husband was insisting that she sleep with three other men. When she refused, he allegedly made her drink some poisonous substance. She told the police that she was rescued by neighbours.
In 1994, a sessions court held Mane guilty under section 498A and sentenced him to three months in jail. He then challenged the verdict, which came up for hearing in the high court earlier this year. The HC said that the allegation against Mane comes under 498A, which talks about a husband or his relative subjecting the woman to cruelty.
Justice Sadhna Jadhav convicted Bhaskar Mane for committing the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which is usually applied in dowry harassment cases. But the judge accepted the plea by Mane's lawyer to treat his case with some leniency as over two decades have passed. The high court sentenced him to two months in jail, which he had already undergone in 1994 after his arrest.
DG EVENT
DJ IN DELHI
DJ EQUIPMENT IN DELHI
DJ LIGHTS IN DELHI
DJ IN DELHI FOR PARTY
DJ IN EAST DELHI
DJ IN SOUTH DELHI
DJ IN WEST DELHI
DJ IN ROHINI DELHI
DJ IN NEW DELHI
DJ IN NORTH DELHI
DJ IN DELHI FOR WEDDING
DJ IN DELHI LIST
EVENT MANAGEMENT COMPANIES IN GURGAON
EVENT MANAGEMENT COMPANIES IN DELHI
EMCEE IN DELHI
EMCEE IN DELHI NCR
FEMALE EMCEE DELHI
LIST FEMALE EMCEE DELHI
DELHI BASED EMCEE
ANCHOR IN DELHI
ANCHOR IN GURGAON
EMCEE IN BANGALORE
FEMALE EMCEE IN BANGALORE
EMCEE BANQUET
DJ IN GURGAON
DJ SETUP IN GURGAON
DJ SERVICES IN GURGAON
DJ SYSTEM IN GURGAON
DJ SOUND GURGAON
"(The wife) deposed before the court in her substantive evidence that her husband had refused to consummate the marriage and was insisting upon her to have sexual relations with three other persons. The allegation itself would be mental harassment to the wife," said the judge. "(It) can be safely inferred that the accused has committed offence punishable under section 498."DJ IN DELHI
DJ EQUIPMENT IN DELHI
DJ LIGHTS IN DELHI
DJ IN DELHI FOR PARTY
DJ IN EAST DELHI
DJ IN SOUTH DELHI
DJ IN WEST DELHI
DJ IN ROHINI DELHI
DJ IN NEW DELHI
DJ IN NORTH DELHI
DJ IN DELHI FOR WEDDING
DJ IN DELHI LIST
EVENT MANAGEMENT COMPANIES IN DELHI
EMCEE IN DELHI
EMCEE IN DELHI NCR
FEMALE EMCEE DELHI
LIST FEMALE EMCEE DELHI
DELHI BASED EMCEE
ANCHOR IN DELHI
ANCHOR IN GURGAON
EMCEE IN BANGALORE
FEMALE EMCEE IN BANGALORE
EMCEE BANQUET
DJ IN GURGAON
DJ SETUP IN GURGAON
DJ SERVICES IN GURGAON
DJ SYSTEM IN GURGAON
DJ SOUND GURGAON
Mane married Laxmibai in 1993, but lived with him only for a short time as they often quarrelled. A year later, she approached the local police and alleged that her husband was insisting that she sleep with three other men. When she refused, he allegedly made her drink some poisonous substance. She told the police that she was rescued by neighbours.
In 1994, a sessions court held Mane guilty under section 498A and sentenced him to three months in jail. He then challenged the verdict, which came up for hearing in the high court earlier this year. The HC said that the allegation against Mane comes under 498A, which talks about a husband or his relative subjecting the woman to cruelty.
Stay updated on the go with The Times of India’s mobile apps. Click here to download it for your device.
No comments:
Post a Comment